Category Archives: Ecology

Ecology of Lake Champlain and how to protect our lake.

Lake Champlain Salmon Restoration Successful in 2014

2014 Lake Champlain Salmon Restoration

Officials from the Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service announced that the assessment results for 2014 show continued gains for Lake Champlain’s landlocked Atlantic salmon fishery restoration.

Lake Champlain Salmon Restoration

Landlocked Atlantic Salmon

“It’s extremely encouraging to see the collaborative efforts of New York, Vermont and federal agency staff fostering the long-term sustainability of the Lake Champlain fishery. Our staffs have made great strides in controlling sea lamprey, benefiting anglers and surrounding communities. However, we must remain vigilant in combatting the invasive sea lamprey so the fishery can continue to rebound and flourish.” ~ Joe Martens, Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
2014 Lake Champlain Salmon Restoration

Fish Culture Operations Chief Adam Miller with a landlocked Atlantic salmon at the Ed Weed Fish Culture Station in Grand Isle, Vermont

The three groups make up the Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative and work collaboratively on restoration efforts. They reported a number of highlights from recent evaluation activities that indicate further improvement to the lake’s salmon population.

The joint efforts have included lampricide treatments to kill young lamprey before they get into Lake Champlain and start to attack salmon and other gamefish, stocking programs and fish ladders and lifts to help the salmon reach spawning grounds.

“We’ve seen several indicators from our 2014 assessments that make it very clear that sea lamprey control and our other salmon restoration initiatives, are continuing to be effective in strengthening the salmon population in Lake Champlain. This is a great sign for the salmon, for the health of Lake Champlain’s fisheries and for anglers.” ~ Brian Chipman, fisheries biologist, Vermont Fish & Wildlife Dept.

 Lake Champlain Salmon Restoration Success Indicators

One of the primary indicators is the strength of annual salmon spawning runs – which have produced several record or near-record numbers in 2014. Some of the key data points include:

  • 158 salmon lifted at the Winooski River Fish Lift at the Winooski One Hydroelectric Facility in Winooski, VT – this is the second highest number in the 22-year history of the fish lift operation. Most of these fish were trucked upstream and released above  the dam in Essex, VT dam for access to suitable spawning habitat.
  • Salmon spawning activity was observed for the first time at several locations in the release section of the Winooski River, and its tributary, the Huntington River.
  • Salmon lifted at the Winooski facility were in excellent health and ranged in size – one was a state record-class male salmon measuring 32 inches and weighing 14 pounds, the largest salmon ever observed from Lake Champlain in the history of the restoration program.
  • A record 724 salmon collected in Hatchery Brook at the Ed Weed Fish Culture Station in Grand Isle, VT. Many of the salmon collected were used to provide eggs for hatchery production.
  • 139 salmon were collected in the Lamoille River below Peterson Dam – this is the most collected in a season since 1993.
  • 43 salmon were captured and passed upstream at the Boquet River fishway in Willsboro, NY – the most passed at this site since 2011.
  • Two other Lake Champlain tributaries not know for significant salmon runs yielded record numbers of salmon in 2014 surveys: 30 salmon in Otter Creek in Vergennes, VT, and 19 salmon in the Missisquoi River in Swanton, VT.
  • Lake Champlain Salmon Restoration Successful in 2014

    Sea Lamprey attached to fish

    Additionally, data from 2014 assessments also show the lowest sea lamprey wounding rates since the long term sea lamprey control program began in 2002.

  • Lamprey wounds on salmon declined from 19 wounds per 100 fish in 2013 to 15 wounds per 100 fish in 2014, meeting the Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife Management Cooperative’s target wounding level for salmon. Lamprey wounds on lake trout also declined to 30 wounds per 100 fish in 2014, from 54 in 2013.
  • This contrasts sharply to the 2003 results when sea lamprey were near peak abundance, at a rate of 93 wounds per 100 salmon. That year, salmon returns were extremely low – only 84 collected from Hatchery Brook, 21 from the Lamoille River, and 14 from the Winooski River.

“The reduction in lamprey wounding rates indicate an overall decrease in sea lamprey abundance in Lake Champlain, and highlights the continued success and improvements in the sea lamprey control program. Through technological advances in survey and treatment methods and the inclusion of newly identified lamprey population infestations, the control program has gained more ground and become more comprehensive in its approach.” ~ Bradley Young, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, sea lamprey control program supervisor

Lamprey have had less of an impact in Lake Champlain which is beneficial to a range of fish species including northern pike, walleye and lake sturgeon, as well as trout and salmon. This progress is expected to translate into better fishing on Lake Champlain for years to come.


Other Lake Champlain Fishing Articles:

 

Link Between Lou Gehrig’s Disease and Algae?

Closing in on ALS? Link between Lou Gehrig’s disease and algae explored

Residents of Toledo, Ohio, lost drinking water for days this summer when toxins from a Lake Erie algal bloom were found in the water supply.

Residents of Toledo, Ohio, lost drinking water for days this summer when toxins from a Lake Erie algal bloom were found in the water supply.

  Staff Writer, Environmental Health News

For 28 years, Bill Gilmore lived in a New Hampshire beach town, where he surfed and kayaked. “I’ve been in water my whole life,” he said. “Before the ocean, it was lakes. I’ve been a water rat since I was four.”

Now Gilmore can no longer swim, fish or surf, let alone button a shirt or lift a fork to his mouth. Earlier this year, he was diagnosed with Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or Lou Gehrig’s disease.

In New England, medical researchers are now uncovering clues that appear to link some cases of the lethal neurological disease to people’s proximity to lakes and coastal waters.

About five years ago, doctors at a New Hampshire hospital noticed a pattern in their ALS patients – many of them, like Gilmore, lived near water. Since then, researchers at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center have identified several ALS hot spots in lake and coastal communities in New England, and they suspect that toxic blooms of blue-green algae – which are becoming more common worldwide – may play a role.

Now scientists are investigating whether breathing a neurotoxin produced by the algae may raise the risk of the disease. They have a long way to go, however: While the toxin does seem to kill nerve cells, no research, even in animals, has confirmed the link to ALS.

blue green algae bloom

blue green algae bloom

No known cause

As with all ALS patients, no one knows what caused Bill Gilmore’s disease. He was a big, strong guy – a carpenter by profession. One morning in 2011, his arms felt weak. “I couldn’t pick up my tools. I thought I had injured myself,” said Gilmore, 59, who lived half his life in Hampton and now lives in Rochester, N.H.

Three years and many doctors’ appointments later, Gilmore received the news in June that the progressive weakening in his limbs was caused by ALS.

Neither Hampton nor Rochester is considered a hot spot for ALS. Gilmore is one of roughly 5,600 people in the United States diagnosed each year with the disease. The average patient lives two to five years from the time of diagnosis.

There is no cure, and for the majority of patients, no known cause. For 90 to 95 percent of people with ALS, there’s no known genetic mutation. Researchers assume that some unknown interaction between genes and the environment is responsible.

In recent years, some of this research has focused on blue-green algae, also known as cyanobacteria.

2014-toxic-algae-infographic-web-final-300x268

“There’s a growing awareness of the importance of gene/environment interactions with neurodegenerative diseases. There is more interest in examining environmental exposures, including exposures to cyanobacteria, as possible risk factors for sporadic ALS,” said Paul Alan Cox, director of the nonprofit Institute of Ethnomedicine in Wyoming, which focuses on treatments for ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Cyanobacteria – some of the oldest organisms on the planet – can occur wherever there is moisture. Blooms are fed largely by nutrients in agricultural and urban runoff.

Some cyanobacteria produce toxic compounds that can sicken people. In August, hundreds of thousands of people in Toledo, Ohio, were left without tap water for days when toxins from an algal bloom in Lake Erie were found in the water supply.

While the cyanobacteria toxin that prompted the Toledo water crisis can cause diarrhea, intestinal pain and liver problems, other toxins produced by the blue-green algae can harm the nervous systems of humans and wildlife.

One morning in 2011, Bill Gilmore’s arms felt weak. He was a big, strong guy, a carpenter by profession. “I couldn’t pick up my tools. I thought I had injured myself,” he said.Scientists have long suspected that a cyanobacteria toxin could play a role in some forms of ALS. After World War II, U.S. military doctors in Guam found that many indigenous Chamorro suffered from a rapidly progressing neurological disease with symptoms similar to both ALS and dementia. Years later, scientists found the neurotoxin BMAA in the brains of Chamorro people who died from the disease. Cyanobacteria that grow on the roots and seeds of cycad trees produce the toxin.

Cox, a researcher in Guam in the 1990s, hypothesized that BMAA worked its way up the food chain from the cycad seeds to bats to the Chamorro who hunted them. But Cox and his colleagues also found BMAA in the brains of Canadian Alzheimer’s patients who had never dined on Guam’s fruit bats. In patients who had died from other causes, they found no traces of it. The source of the BMAA in the Canadians remains unknown.

Some researchers have suggested that fish and shellfish from waters contaminated with cyanobacteria blooms may be one way that people ingest BMAA. In southern France, researchers suspect ALS cases may be linked to consumption of mussels and oysters. Lobsters, collected off the Florida coast near blooms, also have been found with high levels of BMAA.

Scientists around the world are investigating how the neurotoxin gets into the body and whether it contributes to disease.

“We don’t really know what exposure routes are most important,” Cox said.

New England’s ALS hot spots

In New Hampshire, Dartmouth neurologist Elijah Stommel noticed that several ALS patients came from the small town of Enfield in the central part of the state. When he mapped their addresses, he saw that nine of them lived near Lake Mascoma.

blue green algae 2

Around the lake, the incidence of sporadic ALS – cases for which genetics are not a likely cause – is approximately 10 to 25 times the expected rate for a town of that size.

“We had no idea why there appeared to be a cluster around the lake,” Stommel said.

Based on the link between ALS and the neurotoxin in other parts of the world, Stommel and his colleagues hypothesize that the lake’s cyanobacteria blooms could be a factor.

Across northern New England, the researchers have continued to identify ALS hot spots – a large one in Vermont near Lake Champlain and a smattering of smaller ones among coastal communities in New Hampshire and Maine.

Earlier this year, the researchers reported that poorer lake water quality increased the odds of living in a hot spot. Most strikingly, they discovered that living within 18 miles of a lake with high levels of dissolved nitrogen – a pollutant from fertilizer and sewage that feeds algae and cyanobacteria blooms – raised the odds of belonging to an ALS hot spot by 167 percent.

The findings, they wrote, “support the hypothesis that sporadic ALS can be triggered by environmental lake quality and lake conditions that promote harmful algal blooms and increases in cyanobacteria.”

How people in New England communities could be ingesting the neurotoxin remains largely a mystery. While fish in the lakes do contain it, not everyone in the Dartmouth studies eats fish.

“We’ve sent questionnaires to patients and there’s really no common thread in terms of diet or activities,” Stommel said. “The one common thing that everybody does is breathe.”

In other words, it’s possible that a boat, jet ski or even the wind could stir up tiny particles of cyanobacteria in the air, where people then breathe it in.

Testing the air for a neurotoxin

Last August, at Lake Attitash, Jim Haney, a University of New Hampshire biologist, waded knee-deep into swirling green water. Cyanobacteria were blooming at the small lake in the northeastern corner of Massachusetts. Haney had rigged up three vacuum-like devices with pipes, plastic funnels and paper to suck up and filter air near the lake’s surface.

He took the filter papers back to his laboratory and measured the cyanobacteria cells, BMAA and other toxins stuck to them.

“We’ve developed this view of nature as idyllic, which is wonderful, but not everything in nature is benign. Rattlesnakes are natural and you wouldn’t get too close to one of those.” Jim Haney, University of New Hampshire   “We want to know what level lake residents may be exposed to through airborne particles,” said Haney, who is sampling the air at Massachusetts and New Hampshire lakes in collaboration with the Dartmouth team.

Stommel said,“it’s very compelling to look at the filter paper and see it just coated with cyanobacteria.”

At this point, Haney and graduate students are trying to understand under what conditions the toxins might be coming out of the lake and whether the airborne particles are an important route of exposure. Preliminary findings suggest that BMAA and other cyanobacteria cells are being aerolized. There is potentially a large quantity of cyanobacteria that could be inhaled,” Haney said. He noted, however, that the measurements were taken about eight inches above the water’s surface, making it likely that concentrations would be much lower farther away.

While the toxins are likely to be most abundant in the air around lakes, they exist all over the planet, even in deserts.

In 2009, BMAA was even detected in the sands of Qatar. Crusts containing cyanobacteria may lie dormant in the soil for most of the year, but get kicked up during spring rainstorms. Cox and colleagues hypothesized that breathing in toxins from dust might be a trigger for a doubling of ALS incidence in military personnel after Operation Desert Storm.

Near Haney’s workstation at Lake Attitash, a child splashed in the shallow water off a dock. Haney scooped up a cupful of water. He peered at the tiny green particles in the cup that reflect the sunlight, making the mixture resemble a murky pea soup.

“We’ve developed this view of nature as idyllic, which is wonderful, but not everything in nature is benign,” he said. “Rattlesnakes are natural and you wouldn’t get too close to one of those.”

“Proximity does not equal causality”

The hypothesis that exposure to BMAA may trigger the disease in some people remains controversial.

Researchers have evidence that people living close to lakes with blooms may be at increased risk for ALS. They’ve even found BMAA in the diseased brain tissue of people who have died of neurodegenerative diseases. Nevertheless, “proximity does not equal causality,” said Deborah Mash, a neuroscientist at the University of Miami in Florida.

The big, unanswered question is whether the toxin can actually cause the disease. So far, there’s little evidence to show how it could induce the type of brain changes seen in people with ALS.

Tests of human cells have found that BMAA kills the motor neurons – nerve cells that control muscles – implicated in ALS. Primates fed high levels of BMAA in the 1980s showed signs of neurological and muscular weakness. But the toxin did not kill their motor neurons.

“What is lacking at this point is a clear animal model that demonstrates that BMAA exposure results in ALS-like neuropathy,” Cox said.

So what is a possible mechanism for how the toxin may lead to the disease? The body may mistake BMAA for the amino acid L-serine, a naturally occurring component of proteins. When the toxin is mistakenly inserted into proteins, they become “misfolded,” meaning they no longer function properly and can damage cells.

Cox and colleagues soon will test two drugs in FDA-approved clinical trials. They’re about to enter second-phase testing with L-serine. The idea, explained Sandra Banack, a researcher at the Institute for Ethnomedicine, is that large doses of L-serine may be able to “outcompete” low levels of BMAA in the body, preventing it from becoming incorporated into proteins.

For ALS patients like Gilmore, the research can’t come soon enough. “If they can figure out a cause, then hopefully they can find a cure,” Gilmore said.

 

This article originally ran at Environmental Health News, a news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

 

More Articles About Lake Champlain Ecology and  Algae:

                               

 

Vermont Aquatic Nuisance Species Grants

Invasive aquatic species are not only a nuisance to swimmers, boaters and anglers, but they also pose a threat to the survival of native plant and animal species that have long flourished in local waters.

Municipalities have the opportunity to apply for grants to control and prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species.The Grant-in-Aid Program, through the State of Vermont, offers financial assistance to municipalities and agencies for aquatic nuisance species management programs.

Local interest groups, such as lake associations, must apply through the municipality in which the waterbody is located. If the waterbody is located in more than one municipality, the municipalities may apply jointly.

 

Types of Eligible Projects for Vermont Aquatic Nuisance Species Grants

All types of aquatic nuisance control projects, for management of both native and non-native species, are eligible for funds under this grant program.

Vermont Aquatic Nuisance Species Grant-in-Aid Grants

Boat Inspection Station

  • Previously supported projects have included: control programs for Eurasian watermilfoil, purple loosestrife, curly leaf pondweed, and nuisance native aquatic plants, and aquatic nuisance species spread prevention programs.
  • Supported management methods have included: mechanical controls, benthic barriers,  herbicides, and harvesting – even physical removal by hand.
  • Spread prevention programs have included: public access area “greeter” programs, boat wash stations, searches for invasive species, and education/outreach initiatives.

 

Grant-in-Aid Project Selection

Grant awards are prioritized based upon the extent funds are available.  First priority is to projects designed to manage new infestations of aquatic nuisances.  Second priority is to projects designed to prevent or control the further spread of aquatic nuisance species.  Third priority is to recurring maintenance projects.

The prioritizing for individual projects considers: public accessibility and recreational uses; the importance to commercial, agricultural or other interests, the degree of local interest, and local efforts to control aquatic nuisances. Other considerations include: probability of achieving long-term control, the necessity or advantage of the proposed work, and the extent to which the control project is a developmental rather than a maintenance program.

 

Vermont Aquatic Nuisance Species Grant-in-Aid Grants

Lake Seymour Greeter Staff
(Photo credit, J. Selby)

Funding Information

Municipalities may be awarded a grant for up to 75% of the total estimated project cost. Grant recipients must contribute at least 25% of the final eligible project cost. That contribution may be in-kind labor or services and/or actual cash expenditures.

Online applications must be completed by Feb. 11 for funds, training and technical assistance.

Vermont Aquatic Nuisance Species Grant-in-Aid Grants Application Information

For more information, visit the DEC water quality grant page at http://bit.ly/VtWaterQualityGrants , or contact Ann Bove at ann.bove@state.vt.us or (802) 490-6120.

 

Other Lake Champlain Invasive Species Articles:

VT Legislators Looking to Ban Microbeads in Vermont

Legislators to Ban Microbeads in Vermont ?

Members of the Vermont House voted Tuesday to ban the production and sale in Vermont of products containing microbeads. Microbeads are the almost invisible plastic scrubbing granules found in many personal care products, such as soaps and cleansers.

Water quality advocates and environmentalists claim that the non-biodegradable plastic waste get washed down the drain and into the wastewater stream. Microbeads are so small that they can pass through most of the Vermont’s wastewater treatment plants. According to Robert Fischer, chief operator of the Montpelier wastewater treatment plant, the Montpelier facility can only filter out debris more than six millimeters in size. Scientists says the microbeads are often smaller than five millimeters.

Legislators Looking to Ban Microbeads in Vermont

The size of a microbead

“The vast majority have no ability to filter it off, and for the ones that do, it would still be problematic,” Fischer said. There are 59 wastewater treatment plants that discharge into Lake Champlain, and only five in the Burlington area use a cloth filtration to catch microbeads. After removal with other sludge the beads are either sent to a landfill or used as biosolid fertilizer, according to Fischer.

Last week the VT House’s Fish and Wildlife Committee took up bill, H.4,, which would prohibit the manufacture (effective Jan. 1, 2017) and sale (effective Jan. 1, 2018) of the products in Vermont. Last year Illinois enacted a similar ban on microbeads after the beads were found in the Great Lakes. The Illinois bill takes effect one year later. Yesterday the Vermont House voted to impose the ban; the bill still needs Senate approval before becoming law.

Microbeads in Our Waterways

There have been no studies that measure the quantities of microbeads in Vermont’s waterways, but some Lake Champlain scientists say the beads can be seen along the shoreline – along with other trash.

Legislators Looking to Ban Microbeads in Vermont

Legislators Looking to Ban Microbeads in Vermont

Lori Fisher, executive director of the Lake Champlain Committee, says that microbeads do pose harm to aquatic life. She said fish feed on the buoyant beads, mistaking them for fish eggs. “This can cause internal abrasions and blockages resulting in reduced food consumption, stunted growth and starvation. When plankton, mussels or fish fill up on plastic junk food they are likely to lose their appetite for healthier food.” Fisher and others say the microbeads also attract toxic chemicals which can then make their way up the food chain, through studies have not documented this as a risk to public health.

Rachael Miller, executive director of the Rozalia Project, a group of scientists who study marine trash, said pollutants attach themselves to the plastic beads like a sticker and can be carried through the food chain. “The presence of this stuff has the potential to affect the ecosystems, and we are part of that ecosystem,” Miller said.

Martin Wolf of Seventh Generation, a Burlington-based manufacturer of environmental household products, said the company uses ground coconut shell in some of its products. “Microbeads are nonessential. Substances exist that are mineral or biodegradable, perform the same function, and have no meaningful impact on the economics of the products in which they are used,” he said in testimony to the Committee. He said alternatives include hardened seed kernels, crushed cocoa beans, ground coconut shells, oatmeal, calcium carbonate and silica. All of these materials are organic compounds that are biodegradable.

Many manufacturers already use alternatives, such as ground nuts, oatmeal and pumice, and are not opposing the ban. However, they urge Vermont to pass regulations that align with those in Illinois, including postponing the proposed implementation date by one year.

In Vermont’s bill, manufacturing with microbeads would be banned beginning Jan. 1, 2017, and banned for sale the following year. The Personal Care Products Council suggested pushing back the Vermont regulations back by one year to Dec. 31, 2017, to match regulations in Illinois.

“We really look forward to having a commitment to phase out, but we can’t have 50 different sets of rules,” said Mike Thompson of the Personal Care Products Council, a trade group representing cosmetic and personal care member companies. “It’s not a position of any opposition … we are committed to removing microbeads from our products.” “It is something our members started, and the industry is committed to phasing out microbeads on a timely basis,” Thompson said.

 

More Lake Champlain News:

‘The Field Guide to Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents, and Other Mystery Denizens of the Deep’ is a casebook and field guide to the world’s mysterious sea creatures offers insight into pop culture and scientific beliefs, as well as advice on how to investigate such phenomena firsthand.

Enforcement is Latest Tool in Vermont’s Lake Champlain Cleanup Effort

Vermont Outlines Plan to Address Lake Champlain Cleanup

Vermont officials outlined the state’s new plan to address agricultural runoff in the Lake Champlain basin at a conference in St. Albans on Monday. New resources, deeper partnerships across state government, and new accountability tools (including enforcement and penalties by the attorney general’s office) have been established to improve water quality across Vermont. The state is under pressure from the US EPA to move aggressively ahead with cleaning up the lake. If not, the federal govenment could come in and act on its own and bill Vermont for cleanup costs.

Federal law requires Vermont to reduce phosphorus pollution by 36%. Manure runoff from farms is the largest source of phosphorus pollution in Lake Champlain, with at least 40% of the phosphorus pollution coming from farms, according to Vermont’s Agriculture Secretary, Chuck Ross. Cyanobacteria feed on the phosphorus, creating toxic blue-green algae blooms.

Although pollution also flows from developed areas, roads, forests and waste water treatment plants, one of the most cost-effective solutions is to focus on farming operations. This is where Vermont officials say relatively small investments could generate big returns in curbing runoff.

“In the State of the State, the Governor emphasized the state-wide commitment we will all engage in to clean up Lake Champlain. As you know, we have a particular challenge in meeting that goal here in Franklin County. Today, we are here to tell you more about the Clean Water Initiative and the collaborative approach we will take to meet this commitment,”  ~ David Mears, Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation

Enforcement is Latest Tool in Vermont's Lake Champlain Cleanup Effort

Vermont’s Attorney General Bill Sorrell, Agency of Environmental Conservation Commissioner David Mears and Agricultural Secretary Chuck Ross

Agency of Environmental Conservation Commissioner David Mears, Agricultural Secretary Chuck Ross, and Vermont Attorney General Bill Sorrell outlined The Statewide Plan to Enhance Stewardship and Accountability. The plan detailed a 4-pronged approach to address agriculture-related water quality issues in Lake Champlain and the need to zero in on a relatively small number of sources of pollution flowing into rivers that feed into the lake.

 

Resources for Stewardship Practices

Using new resources, the State’s partners, which include federal agencies and local water quality organizations, will work with farmers to provide technical assistance and implement agricultural stewardship practices proven to improve water quality. These practices will include: use of cover crops, buffers, contour tillage, no-till farming, livestock exclusion, barnyard repair, grass waterways and crop rotation.

Agriculture and environmental leaders say the state has worked hard to identify and secure these resources. The USDA has committed $45 million to base program funding, an additional $16.8 million for two Regional Conservation Partnership Program projects ($16 million in USDA funding to benefit Lake Champlain), and $3 million of Lake Champlain Basin Program funding. The Shumlin Administration has also proposed a Clean Water Fund  to raise about $5 million to help levy additional resources and implement water quality improvements.

Enforcement is Latest Tool in Vermont's Lake Champlain Cleanup Effort

Increased Capacity

Agency of Agriculture and the Agency of Natural resources staff are being re-deployed to address the priority regions. Additional staff will also be hired.

These staffing changes will increase capacity for: outreach and education, technical assistance, additional inspections, investigations and data tracking.

Enhanced Partnerships

State partners, Federal partners, NGOs, farmers, and business owners are collaborating in new ways to increase efficiency and improve results.  Some of these include: educating farmers at the farmstead about conservation practices and programs, creating watershed specific plans that incorporate these partnerships for increased efficiency, meeting regularly with these groups at the local level to keep momentum, and coordinating the compliance, investigations and technical assistance to identify the issues and connect farmers with partners that can help plan solutions.

“We have honed our focus to enhance the statewide culture of stewardship and accountability. Stewardship means greater partnership across state government, more technical assistance and new, unprecedented resources for farmers to implement conservation practices. Accountability means we have more tools to bring those who fly in the face of the law into compliance… The majority of farmers are working hard to protect our natural resources. Now there are more resources available to assist them in their efforts.”” ~ Chuck Ross, Vermont’s Secretary of Agriculture

Accountability Tools

The Agency of Agriculture, Agency of Natural Resources and the Attorney General have established enhanced, coordinated enforcement for agriculture water quality; the State is also proposing new ways to hold offenders accountable. For example: current use penalties, new enforcement authorities, emergency order authority, civil penalties and the authority to limit livestock.

Officials say legal enforcement of water quality rules on the state’s farmers is going to be one of the tools that will be used to help clean up Lake Champlain, and penalties could include civil fines, a loss of tax breaks for agricultural lands. Ross and Sorrell both say penalties would be used as a last resort on farms that refuse to comply with water quality efforts.

“My office is working closely with the Agency of Agriculture and the Agency of Natural Resources and is committed to bringing enforcement actions when necessary to address violations of Vermont’s agricultural water quality laws, and especially here in Franklin County. We understand that most Vermont farmers are trying to run sustainable farms that operate within the law and live up to the expectations of Vermonters, but when farms fail to do so, we are ready to step in.” ~ Vermont Attorney General, Bill Sorrell

Vermont’s Lake Champlain Cleanup Recommendations

State leaders urge farmers to contact the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service’s local office and discuss how they can become eligible for these new financial resources to implement conservation practices.

“This initiative leverages one of the state’s most vital resources — Vermont farmers who have demonstrated a commitment to stewarding the land to protect clean water. The initiative offers support for farmers to take actions that will conserve soil and protect water, and ensures that all farmers are held to the same standard,” said Mears.

Farmers are already required to follow accepted agricultural practices, or AAPs, which are designed to limit manure runoff. Now, Vermont is expanding these measures — and is under pressure from federal regulators and water quality advocates to enforce them.

“We’re serious. We mean it,” Ross said. “But we’re also serious that we mean we want to help people do the right thing because we know, it’s been shown many times, that most of the agriculture community is engaged, interested, (they) want to make a contribution, have made a contribution and will continue to make a contribution.”

Enforcement is Latest Tool in Vermont's Lake Champlain Cleanup Effort

 

More Articles About Lake Champlain Ecology and  Algae: